How they differ
A standard chat model starts writing its answer right away. A reasoning model first produces a chain of intermediate steps, then the answer. The steps let it catch mistakes and break a big problem into smaller ones.
That extra work has costs:
- Latency. The first word of the final answer can take much longer. See Latency.
- Tokens. The reasoning usually counts as output tokens, so answers cost more. See Input vs. Output Tokens.
- Settings. Some reasoning models ignore or limit Temperature and similar options.
Working with them
- Leave a generous
max_tokens. If thinking uses up the budget, the answer can be cut short. - Ask for the result you want, not a long list of steps. The model plans on its own.
- Some OpenAI-compatible tools send a
reasoning_effortsetting. Whether a given model or provider honors it varies. - If a client shows a reasoning field, don't feed it back to users as the final answer.
On luv13
luv13 lists its models at https://api.luv13.ai/v1/models, but that list doesn't say which ones are reasoning models. See the luv13 model list, Listing Models and Request Parameters for what luv13 supports. For a prompting approach that works on any model, see Chain-of-Thought Prompting.
Example
A hard multi-step question with plenty of room for the answer:
curl https://api.luv13.ai/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $LUV13_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "luv13/glm-5.3-flash",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "A train leaves at 2:40 p.m. and the trip takes 3 hours 35 minutes. What time does it arrive?"}],
"max_tokens": 2000
}'